SF-12v2® Health Survey
Click the buttons provided below to view information contained in a specific part of this record:
|
General Information
|
| Author/s or Creator/s |
|
John E. Ware, Jr., PhD, et al.
|
|
| Objectives |
|
Developed to be a much shorter, yet valid, alternative to the SF-36v2® for use in large surveys of general and specific populations as well as large longitudinal studies of health outcomes.
|
|
| Category of Outcome Measure |
Functional
Health-Related Quality of Life
|
|
| Disease Type |
| |
Used |
Validated |
| Peripheral Nerve |
X |
|
| Muscle |
X |
|
| Generic |
|
X |
| Respiratory |
X |
|
| Cardiac |
|
X |
|
|
| Chronology of Development |
|
The changes in the SF-12v2® Health Survey relative to the original SF-12® Health Survey, which are a product of more than 10 years of experience with findings reported in thousands of publications about the SF-36® Health Survey and the SF-12® Health Survey, follow exactly those previously recommended and adopted for the SF-36v2® Health Survey (see Ware, Kosinski and Dewey, 2000)
Relative to the original SF-12® Health Survey, improvements in the SF-12v2® survey include:
•Improvements in instructions and questionnaire items to shorten and simplify the wording and make it more familiar and less ambiguous;
•An improved layout for questions and answers in the self-administered forms that makes it easier to read and complete, and that reduces missing responses;
•Greater comparability with translations and cultural adaptations widely-used in the U.S. and in other countries;
•Five-level response choices in place of dichotomous response choices for four items in the two role functioning scales; and
•Five-level (in place of six-level) response categories to simplify items in the Mental Health (MH) and Vitality (VT) scales.
|
|
| Mode of Assessment |
Self administered on site
Self administered off site
Administered by trained evaluator
Web based
Interactive Voice Response (IVR) - via telephone
Static (Paper/Pencil)
Interviewer Script
Dynamic Health Assessment (Computerzied Adaptive Test)
|
|
| Age Group |
Adults (Generally 18 Years and Over)
|
|
| Languages |
| |
Original |
Definitive Validated Translation |
Informal Translation |
| English US |
X |
|
|
| 120 Translations Available |
|
X |
|
|
|
| Conditions of Use and Contact Information |
| Conditions of Use |
Payment of Academic/Non Profit Research Fee
Subject to Written Contract
Payment of Profit Fee (Commercial/Pharmaceutical)
|
|
| Copyright Owner |
|
Medical Outcomes Trust & QualityMetric Incorporated
|
|
| Organisation Name |
|
QualityMetric Incorporated
|
|
| Postal Address |
|
24 Albion Road
Building 400
Lincoln, RI 02865
|
|
|
|
|
Questionnaire/Scale
|
| Domain Name / Number of Items |
|
Physical Functioning (PF) (2 items)
|
|
Role Physical (RP) (2 items)
|
|
Bodily Pain (BP) (1 item)
|
|
General Health (GH) (1 item)
|
|
Social Functioning (SF) (1 item)
|
|
Role Emotional (RE) (2 items)
|
|
Mental Health (MH) (2 items)
|
|
| Additional Format Information |
|
The PCS (Physical Component Summary)and MCS (Mental Component Summary) scores provide, as their labels suggest, a summary of the respondent's health status from both broad physical health perspective and a broad mental health perspective. Results on the PCS and MCS measures should serve as a starting place for determining whether functional limitations exist in either of the two major components of health; if so, the health domains contributing greatest to the affected dimension(s) and the items they comprise require further examination to ascertain their potential contribution to the respondent's impaired functioning.
|
|
| Question Types and Usage |
|
3-point Likart scale (2 items)
|
|
5-point Likart scale (10 items)
|
|
| Total Score |
No - total score is not calculated.
|
|
| Total Score - Range/Direction |
|
| Sub-Score |
Yes - sub-score is calculated.
|
|
| Sub-Score Range/Direction |
|
Higher score indicates better HRQOL
|
|
|
|
|
Reference 1
|
| Reference Details |
|
Ware, J.E., Jr., Kosinski, M., Turner-Bowker, D.M., Gandek, B. How to Score Version 2 of the SF-12v2® Health
Survey (With a Supplement Documenting SF-12® Health Survey) Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated,
2002.
|
|
|
|